Program quality indicators
Supply, demand and enrolment
Indicators | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spots available | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 150 | 180 |
Applications received | - | 276 | 279 | 154 | 102 | 144 |
Newly enrolled students | 139 | 141 | 135 | 140 | 93 | 89 |
Origin
Students come from… | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The same university | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
The Catalan University System (SUC) | 63 | 71 | 67 | 0 | 0 | - |
Other Spanish universities | 32 | 40 | 31 | 76 | 59 | 52 |
Foreign universities | 38 | 30 | 37 | 64 | 34 | 37 |
TOTAL | 139 | 141 | 135 | 140 | 93 | 89 |
Programme faculty suitability
Faculty by category and PhD
2021-22 | URL PhD Assistant Professor | URL Lecturer | URL Professor | URL Contracted PhD | URL Associate Professor | URL Assistant Professor | Guest Faculty | Total Prof. | % Total Prof. | % Accredited Faculty (ANECA/AQU) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PhDs | 1 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 65% | 78% |
Non-PhDs | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 35% | - |
TOTAL | 3 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 62 | 100% | - |
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD
2021-22 | URL PhD Assistant Professor | URL Lecturer | URL Professor | URL Contracted PhD | URL Associate Professor | URL Assistant Professor | Guest Faculty | Total Prof. | % Total Prof. | % HIDAS by Accredited Faculty (ANECA/AQU) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PhDs | 57.5 | 29 | 70 | 366.8 | 358.3 | 0 | 50.3 | 931.9 | 64% | 75% |
Non-PhDs | 80 | 450.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 530.8 | 36% | - |
TOTAL | 137.5 | 479.8 | 70 | 366.8 | 358.3 | 0 | 50.3 | 1,462.7 | 100% | - |
9% | 33% | 5% | 25% | 24% | 0% | 3% |
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty track
2021-22 | Research Track | Period of Teaching* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
None | Inactive track | Active track | None | Inactive track | Active track | |
EMBA | 1,058.6 | 72.5 | 331.6 | 459.6 | 200 | 803.1 |
72% | 5% | 23% | 31% | 14% | 55% |
*The teaching track does not apply to private universities; calculated based on faculty participating in the Docentia Programme.
Full-time students per full-time faculty
2021-22 | Full-time faculty | Full-time students | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
EMBA | 6.1 | 87 | 1/14 |
General satisfaction with faculty
From 1 to 7 | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBA | Compulsory courses | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 6.2 |
Electives | 6.3 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6 | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Student satisfaction with the suitability of learning support systems
Student satisfaction with learning support systems
2021-22 AQU | From 1 to 5 | AQU response rate |
---|---|---|
2. The Master's programme is well-organised (course coordination and sequence, schedule, calendar, etc.). | 3.9 | 35.6% |
12. The master's degree has given me opportunities to access a research and / or professional community. | 4.6 | |
14. The training I received has allowed me to improve my skills to develop my professional activity. | 4.7 |
Student satisfaction with material resources
2021-22 AQU | AQU response rate | |
---|---|---|
11. The facilities and specialised resources (classrooms, labs, computer equipment, library, research equipment, etc.) were appropriate. | 4.6 | 35.6% |
Quality indicators of program results
Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience
AQU Survey indicators | From 1 to 5 | % response |
---|---|---|
4. The content of the subjects is adapted to the training profile of the master's degree. | 4.3 | 35.6% |
5. The teaching methodology favoured my learning. | 4.4 | |
6. Assessment systems have adequately reflected my learning. | 4.0 | |
7. The volume of work required is consistent with the number of credits of the subjects and the TFM. | 4.0 | |
8. I am satisfied with the faculty. | 4.2 | |
9. I am satisfied with the external internship. | 3.9 | |
10. I'm satisfied with the Final Master's Project (TFM). | 4.5 | |
13. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analysis, teamwork, etc.) | 4.7 | |
15. I'm satisfied with the Master. | 4.5 | |
16. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same Master's programme. | 16% No 84% Yes |
|
17. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school. | 13% NO 88% YES |
Overall academic outcomes
Indicators | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance | 97,3% | 97,8% | 92.45% | 89.1% | 81% | 91.5% |
Efficiency | 80,7% | 8,8% | 90.41% | 93.8% | 100% | 95.4% |
Graduation | 98,8% | 90,1% | 92.8% | 82.4% | 58% | 51.8% |
Attrition | 3,1% | 10,6% | 8.6% | 6.3% | 10.4% | 8.6% |
Job placement
2021-22 Indicators | Value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Placement | Employed | 91% | |
Adequacy (functions) | Related to the programme | 100% | |
University-related | 0% | ||
Not university-related | 0% |