Academic indicators

Program quality indicators

Supply, demand, and enrolment

 

Indicators 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
Spots available 15 15 13 13
Applications received 83 85 63 86
Newly enrolled students 12 11 11 13

 

 

Origin

 

Students come from… 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
The same university - - 2 3
The Catalan University System (SUC) 0 0 3 3
Other Spanish universities 1 3 0 0
Foreign universities 11 8 6 7
TOTAL 12 11 11 13

 

 

Program faculty suitability

Faculty by category and PhD

 

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor URL Lecturer URL Professor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor Total Prof. % Total Prof. % Accredited Faculty (ANECA /AQU)
PhDs 0 1 6 15 2 12 36 100% 97%
Non-PhDs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% -
TOTAL 0 1 6 15 2 12 36 100% -

*Others =  1 Emeritus professor

 

Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD

 

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor URL Lecturer URL Professor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor Total Prof. % Total Prof. % HIDAS by Accredited Faculty (ANECA /AQU)
PhDs 0 12 175 180 22 175 564 100% 98%
Non-PhDs 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 -
TOTAL 0 12 175 180 22 175 564 100% -
  0% 2% 31% 32% 4% 31%      

*Others =  1 Emeritus professor

 

Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty track

 

2021-22 Research Track Period of Teaching
  None Inactive track Active track None Inactive track Active track
MRes 102 78 384 81 13 470
  18% 14% 68% 14% 2% 83%

 

Full-time students per full-time faculty

 

2021-22 Full-time faculty Full-time students Ratio
MRes 2.4 11 1/5

 

 

General satisfaction with faculty

 

From 1 to 7 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
MRes        
Compulsory courses 6.4 6.1 6.3 6
Electives 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.8

 

 

Student satisfaction with learning support systems

 

2021-22 AQU From 1 to 5 AQU response rate

2. The Master's programme is well-organised (course coordination and sequence, schedule, calendar, etc.).

3.7 81.8%
12. The master's degree has given me opportunities to access a research and/or professional community. 4.6
14. The training I received has allowed me to improve my skills to develop my professional activity. 4.4

 

Program outcomes and quality

2021-22 AQU From 1 to 5 AQU response rate

11. The facilities and specialised resources (classrooms, labs, computer equipment, library, research equipment, etc.) were appropriate.

4.6 81.8%

 

 

Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience

 

AQU Survey indicators 2021-22 From 1 to 5 % responsive
4. The content of the courses is adequate to the educational profile of the master's degree. 4.1 81.8%
5. The teaching methodology favoured my learning. 3.9
6. Assessment systems have adequately reflected my learning. 4.0
7. The volume of work required is consistent with the number of credits of the subjects and the TFM. 3.7
8. I am satisfied with the faculty. 4.3
9. I am satisfied with external internships. 4.0
10. I'm satisfied with the Final Master's Project (TFM). 4.3
13. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analysis, teamwork, etc.) 4.4
15. I'm satisfied with the Master. 4.1
16. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same Master's program. 22% No
78%Yes
17. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school. 11% No
89%Yes

 

 

Overall academic outcomes

 

Indicators 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Performance 100% 100% 96%
Efficiency 100% 100% 100%
Graduation 90.9% 100% 100%
Attrition 0% 0% 0%

 

 

Job placement

 

2021-22 Indicators   Values relative to the total cohort
Placement Employed 100%
Unemployed 0%
Inactive 0%
No information 0%
Adequacy (functions) Related to the program 0%
University-related 90%
Not university-related 10%